ACIJLP holds the government responsible for the continuation of the crisis of the Egyptian Bar Association, and warns against an escalation of lawyers' protest Saturday, 20 March 1999
The Arab Center for the Independence of the Judiciary and the Legal Profession (ACIJLP) follows with deep concern the escalation in the crisis of the Egyptian Bar Association following preventing Egyptian lawyers from holding their second extraordinary general assembly which was scheduled on Thursday 18 March 1999. Security forces closed the premises of the General Bar Association, as well as the office of the Cairo branch of the Bar, which is located in the High Judicial Complex which also includes the Higher Constitutional Court, the Court of Cassation, the Higher Court of Appeals, and the office of the Public Prosecutor. People, workers and lawyers were not allowed to enter the building which was surrounded by security vehicles full of central security forces and special forces. There was even trained dogs for fear of any disturbance by the lawyers. In their attempt to reach a solution to the Bar crisis, the lawyers escalated their protest over the past period. In this contexts, one month ago, a number of lawyers presented an application signed by 1500 lawyers to the judicial sequestration committee calling for an extraordinary general assembly, as stipulated by article 128 of the law on the legal profession. According to this article, in case the members were not invited for an assembly within a maximum period of thirty days form the date of the application, the general assembly shall be held on the first day following this period. The judicial sequestration committee announced this assembly to be illegal, and informed the Public Prosecutor who, in his turn, asserted that the Public Prosecution is not the area of competence regarding the prevention of this assembly. On Thursday, about 1000 lawyers went to the offices of the General Bar Association, and were surprised by a large number of security vehicles and state security men, standing there. The High Judicial Complex was not in a better situation than the General Bar. Thus, the lawyers had to hold their general assembly in front of the High Judicial Complex at the 26th of July street. The assembly formed a temporary committee to be in charge of preparing all the documents and procedures necessary for holding the elections in order to elect a head and a council for the Bar Association . Prior to this development, on 15 March 1999, a number of lawyers organized a march and presented a note of protest to the head of the judicial committee in charge of elections in professional unions. They called the committee to hold elections in the Bar as soon as possible. It must be noted that in a press conference on 9 March 1999, Mr. Mahfouz Shuman, head of said judicial committee on elections in professional unions, who is also president of the South Cairo Court of First Instance, said that the committee received the lists of names of members of the Bar Association without being signed by the heads of its three branches, and that the judicial sequestration committee did not revise them to remove names of lawyers who do not practice the legal profession, the deceased, and those imprisoned in relation to dishonoring cases. Although the government announced, officially, that it adopts a neutral stance towards the lawyers assembly, and although the Public Prosecutor announced that the Public Prosecution is not the competent authority to prevent the assembly, the ACIJLP believes that the government bears full responsibility for hampering this assembly by dispatching large number of security forces to close the General Bar Association offices as well as the whole building of the High Judicial Complex. This action asserts that the government insisted on preventing any general assembly, and refutes its claims that the Bar crisis is an internal matter which reflects disputes and divisions among the lawyers, and its call for them to unit to solve the crisis!! The government is thus even escalates its actions against the Bar. It had previously allowed an extraordinary general assembly held at the Cairo branch of the Bar Association in the High Judicial Complex on 15 May 1997, after it prevented the assembly to be held in the offices of the General Bar Association. Regardless of the validity of the procedures of this assembly and the temporary committee it formed, which adds more complications to the crisis, the ACIJLP condemns the involvement of the government which was manifested by sending security forces to prevent the assembly. The government is thus violates the provisions of articles 23 and 24 of the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers. These articles assert the right of lawyers to freedom of expression, to form leagues and hold assemblies without retractions. They added that lawyers have the right to form and join professional institutions which they run by themselves, and that an executive board of the institution shall be elected by its members to take its responsibilities without outside interference. The involvement of the government was also asserted in a report issued in April 1998 by a mission sent by the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) to investigate the crisis of the Egyptian Bar association. The mission noticed that the government is content with the continuation of the current situation. On the other hand, the Arab Center for the Independence of the Judiciary and the Legal Profession asserts that the delay in revising the electoral lists cannot be accepted as a reason for not holding the elections. In fact, according to article 6 bis of law 5 of 1995 amending law no 100 of 1993 on professional unions, the judicial committee on elections in professional unions is legally responsible for a full supervision of all stages of the electoral process. The ACIJLP accuses both the judicial committee on elections in professional unions, which is responsible for preparing the lists, and the judicial sequestration committee of deliberately hampering the holding of the elections of the Bar Association. It urges them to promptly revise the electoral lists to allow the holding of the elections which have been postponed for three years now. The sequestration committee can make sure of the number of lawyers who have the right to attend the general assembly by referring to the names of those who paid the subscription fees for 1998, which are recorded on the computer. These names will certainly be free from the detained and deceased lawyers as it is a condition that lawyers pay the fees personally. Also the head of the judicial committee on the elections of professional unions can require a list from the Public Prosecution of lawyers who are accused in criminal cases. The ACIJLP believes that the recent escalation would indicate that the crisis of the Bar Association has entered a new and more complicated stage, and that the government is paving the way for this crisis to continue for undetermined period. The ACIJLP lays full responsibility on the government, the judicial committee on elections in professional unions, and the judicial sequestration committee for preventing the holding of the general assembly of the bar, and thus prolong the bar crisis. This prevention violates the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers which assert lawyer's right to set their independent leagues. The center warns that the prevention of all legitimate movements by the lawyers would result in more violent forms of protest by the lawyers. It calls on the head of the judicial committee to assume his responsibilities and promptly manage to have the electoral lists revised, or to form a committee specially for this purpose, and to set a date for the elections to be held as soon as possible. __________________________________________________________ Contact Nasser Amin Generan Director ACIJLP 8/10 Mathaf el-Manyal St., Manyal el-Roda, Cairo, 11451 Egypt Tel/Fax(202) 3620732
This document is published online by Derechos Human Rights